A brief background
- EcoMetrologia

- Sep 10, 2021
- 7 min read
Technical-scientific evolution, mediated by Industrial Revolutions, provided society with sufficient conditions to occupy the globe significantly. Currently, the world population reaches about 7 billion individuals, distributed in the most different climatic and biogeographic conditions. However, population growth has intensified the use of natural resources, renewable and non-renewable, and the production of waste. Naturally, anthropogenic inflows and outflows have altered ecosystem conditions, affecting the thermodynamic balance of the planet (Brondizio et al., 2016; Ellis, 2015; Ellis et al., 2013; Ellis et al., 2013; Ellis, Antill & Kreft, 2012; Ellis, 2011; Ellis et al., 2010; Rodrigues et al., 2008).
In this sense, global climate change has a strong correlation with the anthropization of natural environments and with the global industrialization process. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2018) points out that these two factors are intensifying the increase in the global thermal amplitude. According to the same source, the changes generated by this variation significantly affect biogeochemical cycles, disturbing planetary resilience (Buschbacher, 2014; Edenhofer et al., 2014; Blanco et al., 2014; Hegerl et al., 2010; Marengo & Valverde, 2007; Weyant et al., 1996).
In addition, Rockstrom et al. (2009) present that the intensification of industrial and anthropic processes is a historic landmark for planet Earth. Delanty (2018) and Lewis & Maslin (2015) point out that the Anthropocene represents a new Geological Era, understood as the Era of Humans (figure 1). The engines of this transformation, which intensified with the Industrial Revolutions, according to the same author, are: climate change, ocean acidification, changes in the ozone layer, increases in the phosphorus and nitrogen cycles, the availability of drinking water, changes in land use, loss of biodiversity, chemical pollution and increased use and dumping of aerosols into the atmosphere (Brondizio et al., 2016; Steffen et al., 2015; Ellis, 2014; Ellis et al., 2016; al., 2013; Ellis, 2011).
Figure 1: Geological Ages – Timeline

Source: the author.
These engines, which drove geological change, are critical elements for maintaining planetary resilience. By exceeding the limits established for each of them, the system enters thermodynamic imbalance, making the cycling of elements difficult and directly influencing human and environmental health (Steffen et al., 2015; Rockstrom et al., 2009). Therefore, it became imperative to control, minimize and mitigate the increase in these indicators, ensuring a safe environment for the survival of humanity and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals established within the scope of the United Nations (UN BRAZIL, 2020; Ellis, 2015; Defries et al., 2012; Egler, 2012; Marengo, 2007; Folke, Olsson & Norberg, 2005).
This is the path that Environmental Sciences have been working on. Intuiting to maintain the planet's resilience and the survival and perpetuation of the hominid genus, efforts converge towards the adequacy of the use of spaces and natural resources. Both efforts reflect actions that are framed within the land use planning. Thus, the development and application of technologies and tools that assist in this planning are increasingly needed (Calvin et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Chuai & Feng, 2019; Iwasaka, 2018; Fu et al., 2016; Magliocca et al., 2015; Krey et al., 2014; Ellis, 2004).
Bibliographic references
BLANCO, G. et al. Drivers, Trends and Mitigation. In: EDENHOFER, O. et al. (Eds.). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 351-412, 2014. Available in: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter5.pdf.
BRONDIZIO, E. S. et al. Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: a call for collaboration. Global Environmental Change, v. 39, p. 318-327, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.006.
BUSCHBACHER, R.; A teoria da resiliência e os sistemas sócio-ecológicos: como se preparar para um futuro imprevisível?. Boletim Regional, Urbano e Ambiental IPEA, p. 12-24, 2014. Available in: http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/4678.
CALVIN, K. et al. Characteristics of human-climate feedbacks differ at different radiative forcing levels. Global and Planetary Change, v. 180, p. 126-135, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.06.003.
CHUAI, X. & FENG, J.; High resolution carbon emissions simulation and spatial heterogeneity analysis based on big data in Nanjing City, China. Science of the Total Environment, v. 826, p. 828-837, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.138.
DEFRIES, R. S.; ELLIS, E. C.; CHAPIN III, F. S.; MATSON, P. A.; TURNER II, B. L.; AGRAWAL, A.; CRUTZEN, P. J.; FIELD, C.; GLEICK, P.; KAREIVA, P. M.; LAMBIN, E.; LIVERMAN, D.; OSTROM, E.; SANCHEZ, P. A.; SYVITSKI, J.; Planetary Opportunities: a social contract for global changes science to contribute to a sustainable future. BioScience, v. 62, n. 6, p. 603-606, 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.11.
DELANTY, G.; Os desafios da globalização e a imaginação cosmopolita: as implicações do Antropoceno. Sociedade e Estado, v. 33, n. 02, p. 373-388, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-699220183302004.
EDENHOFER, O. et al. Technical Summary. In: EDENHOFER, O. et al. (Eds.); Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change – contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 4-30, 2014. Available in: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_summary-for-policymakers.pdf.
EGLER, M.; Gerenciamento integrado de recursos hídricos no Estado do Rio de Janeiro: ensaio de indicador para o estabelecimento da avaliação das relações entre qualidade da água e cobertura vegetal. 2012. Tese (Doutorado em Planejamento Energético) – Programa de Pós-graduação em Planejamento Energético (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. Available in: http://www.ppe.ufrj.br/index.php/pt/publicacoes/teses-e-dissertacoes/2012/543-gerenciamento-integrado-de-recursos-hidricos-no-estado-do-rio-janeiro-ensaio-de-indicador-para-o-estabelecimento-da-avaliacao-das-relacoes-entre-qualidade-da-agua-e-cobertura-vegetal.
ELLIS, E. C.; Anthropogenic Taxonomies – A Taxonomy of the Human Biosphere. In.: REED, C. & LISTER N.-M.; Projective Ecologies. Anthro-Ecologies, Hybridity, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, p. 168-182, 2014. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4524.6240.
ELLIS, E. C.; Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, v. 369, p. 1010-1035, 2011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331.
ELLIS, E. C.; ANTILL, E. C.; KREFT, H.; All Is Not Loss: plant biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Plos One, v. 7, p. 1-9, 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030535.
ELLIS, E. C.; FULLER, D. Q.; KAPLAN, J. O.; LUTTERS, W. G.; Dating the Anthropocene: towards an empirical global history of human transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, v. 1, n. 18, p. 1-6, 2013. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000018.
ELLIS, E. C.; GOLDEWIJK, K. K.; SIEBERT, S.; LIGHTMAN, D.; RAMANKUTTY, N.; Antropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v. 19, p. 589-606, 2010. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x.
ELLIS, E. C.; KAPLAN, J. O.; FULLER, D. Q.; VAVRUS, S.; GOLDEWIJK, K. K.; VERBURG, P. H.; Used Planet: a global history. PNAS, v. 110, n. 20, p. 7978-7985, 2013. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217241110.
ELLIS, E. C.; Long-term ecological changes in the densely populated rural landscape of China. Ecosystems and Land Use Change, v. 153, p. 303-320, 2004. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/153GM23.
ELLIS, E. C.; Too big for nature. In.: MINTER, B. A. & PYNE, S. J.; After Preservation: saving American nature in the age of humans. University of Chicago Press, p. 24-31, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjh.ach.51.3.rev43.
FOLKE, C.; HAHN, T.; OLSSON, P.; NORBERG, J.; Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Environmental and Resources, v. 30, p. 441-473, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.
FU, X.; WANG, S.; CHANG, X.; CAI, S.; XING, J.; HAO, J.; Modeling analysis of secondary inorganic aerosol over China: pollution characteristics and meteorological and dust impacts. Nature (Scientific Reports), n. 6, p. 1-7, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35992.
HEGERL, G. C. et al. Good practice guidance paper on detection and attribution related to anthropogenic climate change. In: STOCKER, T. F. et al. Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: expert meeting on detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change. IPCC – Working Group I and Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, Switzerland, p. 1-9, 2010. Available in: https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/ipcc_good_practice_guidance_paper_anthropogenic.pdf.
IWASAKA, F. Y.; Políticas públicas e economia circular: levantamento internacional e avaliação da Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos. 2018. Dissertação (mestrado em Engenharia de Produção) – Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. Available in: https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18156/tde-08102018-110158/pt-br.php.
KREY, V.; MASERA, O.; BLANFORD, G.; BRUCKNER, T.; COOKE, R.; FISHER-VANDEN, K.; HABERL, H.; HERTWICH, E.; KRIEGLER, E.; MUELLER, D.; PALTSEV, S.; PRICE, L.; SCHLOMER, S.; URGE-VORSATZ, D.; VUUREN, D. van; ZWICKEL, T.; Annex II: Metrics & methodology. In: EDENHOFER, O.; PICHS-MADRUGA, R.; SOKONA, Y.; FARAHANI, E.; KADNER, S.; SEYBOTH, K.; ADLER, A.; BAUM, I.; BRUNNER, S.; EICKEMEIER, P.; KRIEMANN, B.; SAVOLAINEN, J. SCHLÖMER, S. STECHOW, C. von; ZWICKEL, T.; MINX, J. C. (Eds.); Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change – contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 1281-1328, 2014. Available in: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/11109.
LEWIS, S. L. & MASLIN, M. A.; A transparent framework for defining the Anthropocene Epoch. The Anthropocene Review, v. 02, n. 02, p. 128-146, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053019615588792.
MAGLIOCCA, N. R.; RUDEL, T. K.; VERBURG, P. H.; McCONNELL, W. J.; MERTZ, O.; GERSTNER, K.; HEINIMANN, A.; ELLIS, E. C.; Synthesis in Land Change Science: methodological patterns, challenges and guidelines. Springer, v. 15, p. 211-226, 2015. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8.
MARENGO, J. A. & VALVERDE, M. C.; Caracterização do clima no século XX e cenário de mudanças clima para o Brasil no século XXI usando o modelo do IPCC-AR4. Multiciência, v. 8, p. 5-28, 2007. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jose-Marengo-2/publication/239557718_Caracterizacao_do_clima_no_Seculo_XX_e_Cenario_de_Mudancas_de_clima_para_o_Brasil_no_Seculo_XXI_usando_os_modelos_do_IPCC-AR4/links/0deec528e7d02d40d6000000/Caracterizacao-do-clima-no-Seculo-XX-e-Cenario-de-Mudancas-de-clima-para-o-Brasil-no-Seculo-XXI-usando-os-modelos-do-IPCC-AR4.pdf.
MARENGO, J. A.; Os modelos globais e cenários climáticos do IPCC (Parte II). In: MARENGO, J. A.; Mudanças climáticas globais e seus efeitos sobre a diversidade: caracterização do clima atual e definição das alterações climáticas para o território brasileiro ao longo do século XXI. Brasília, p. 83-143, 2007. Available in: https://livroaberto.ibict.br/bitstream/1/986/1/mudan%C3%A7as%20clim%C3%A1ticas%20globais%20e%20seus%20efeitos%20.....pdf.
NAÇÕES UNIDAS BRASIL (ONU BRASIL); Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Available in: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs.
ROCKSTRÖM, J. et al. A Safe operating space for humanity. Nature, v. 461, p. 472-475, 2009. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
RODRIGUES, B. A. et al. A strategy for reviewing knowledge on the links between wild nature and human wellbeing. In: RODRIGUES, B. A. et al. The economics of biodiversity and ecosystem. Cambridge: Scoping the Science, p. 27-45, 2008. Available in: https://edepot.wur.nl/8959.
STEFFEN, W.; RICHARDSON, K.; ROCKSTRÖM, J.; CORNELL, S. E.; FETZER, I.; BENNETT, E. M.; BIGGS, R.; CARPENTER, S. R.; VRIES, W. de; WIT, C. A. de; FOLKE, C.; GERTEN, D.; HEINKE, J.; MACE, G. M.; PERSSON, L. M.; RAMANATHAN, V.; REYERS, B.; SORLIN, S.; Planetary Boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, v. 347, n. 6223, p. 1-12, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
WANG, S.; YANG, K.; YUAN, D.; YU, K.; SU, Y.; Temporal-spatial changes about the landscape pattern of water system and their relationship with food and energy in a mega city in China. Ecological Modelling, n. 401, p. 75-84, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.02.010.
WEYANT, J. et al. First results from integrated assessment models. In: BRUCE, J. P.; LEE, H.; HAITES, E. F.; Climate change 1995: economic and social dimensions of climate change. IPCC, Cambridge University Press, p. 382-391, 1996. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221678860_Integrated_Assessment_of_Climate_Change_An_Overview_and_Comparison_of_Approaches_and_Results?enrichId=rgreq-983241eb-7401-4de7-a525-351b524cc8c3&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyMTY3ODg2MDtBUzoyNDg3ODQ2NzIyNjAwOTZAMTQzNjMyNjI5NjI5MA%3D%3D&el=1_x_2.




Comments